<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flomax Was Most-Recalled Drug Ad On TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/flomax-was-most-recalled-drug-ad-on-tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/flomax-was-most-recalled-drug-ad-on-tv/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/flomax-was-most-recalled-drug-ad-on-tv/#comment-443857</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19628#comment-443857</guid>
		<description>Errata: excuse the various typos -- from the iPhone, tonight, on a train.

Namaste</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errata: excuse the various typos &#8212; from the iPhone, tonight, on a train.</p>
<p>Namaste</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/flomax-was-most-recalled-drug-ad-on-tv/#comment-443856</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19628#comment-443856</guid>
		<description>While I do not claim that this data would hold up over the longer term, in a more rigorously controlled study, it is fascinating that last month -- based on an &lt;a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/10/percentage-of-positive-branded-drug.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Advertising Age&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; story I blogged about&lt;/a&gt; -- in which twitter/tweets, stumbles, .txts and other social media mentions, several branded prescription phramaceuticals were near the bottom of the list -- for percentage of favorable mentions.

The amazingly positive exception to this negative mention rule was. . . yep, you guessed it!

V I A G R A.

Guardasil got only 16 percent psitive mentions, vs. nearly 70 percent positive for Viagra (but that musta' been a lot of fat-sugar-daddies txt-ing away, each night!). . . . 

So (and to overstate the point, for the sake of clarity) -- is it really a &lt;i&gt;good thing&lt;/i&gt;, if it turns out that &lt;i&gt;even great&lt;/i&gt; DTC campaigns help to fix largely NEGATIVE memories of a pharma product, by name, in the consumers' minds?

I dunno.

Namaste</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do not claim that this data would hold up over the longer term, in a more rigorously controlled study, it is fascinating that last month &#8212; based on an <a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/10/percentage-of-positive-branded-drug.html" rel="nofollow"><b><i>Advertising Age</i></b> story I blogged about</a> &#8212; in which twitter/tweets, stumbles, .txts and other social media mentions, several branded prescription phramaceuticals were near the bottom of the list &#8212; for percentage of favorable mentions.</p>
<p>The amazingly positive exception to this negative mention rule was. . . yep, you guessed it!</p>
<p>V I A G R A.</p>
<p>Guardasil got only 16 percent psitive mentions, vs. nearly 70 percent positive for Viagra (but that musta&#8217; been a lot of fat-sugar-daddies txt-ing away, each night!). . . . </p>
<p>So (and to overstate the point, for the sake of clarity) &#8212; is it really a <i>good thing</i>, if it turns out that <i>even great</i> DTC campaigns help to fix largely NEGATIVE memories of a pharma product, by name, in the consumers&#8217; minds?</p>
<p>I dunno.</p>
<p>Namaste</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/flomax-was-most-recalled-drug-ad-on-tv/#comment-443795</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=19628#comment-443795</guid>
		<description>I still laugh about the ED where men 
threw footballs through a hanging tire - 
could that have been a little less obvious?

Can we get rid of D2C ads now, please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still laugh about the ED where men<br />
threw footballs through a hanging tire -<br />
could that have been a little less obvious?</p>
<p>Can we get rid of D2C ads now, please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.158 seconds -->

