Comments on: Pfizer Must Pay $75M In Damages Over Prempro

By: Mathemagician

Mathemagician — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:34:16 +0000

And Scalia could kiss my rump too.

By: Mathemagician

Mathemagician — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:30:23 +0000

Folks, let’s put this into some perspective. A company that owns a useless 2.7 BILLION per year product is paying a plaintiff 3.7 MILLION in damages.

$3.7 Million is 0.0013703 % of the total amount that ONE product manufactured by this company.

$75 Million is 0.0277777 % of the total of this same product’s annual earnings.

ONE batch of Prevnar takes about one week to manufacture.
ONE batch of Prevnar brings in $40 Million.

Are the figures being agreed upon supposed to
alter the future actions of companies like this? Cry me an effing river!

Wake up!!! This is outrageous bulls$&t!!!

By: Red Fraggle

Red Fraggle — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:14:49 +0000

Why don’t we plant tumors in the bodies of the sons of bitches who withheld this data? That would almost be fair…

By: Mike Santomarco

Mike Santomarco — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:17:24 +0000

$75M??? That is absurdly low given the fact that in two weeks, two batches of Prevnar could be produced at $40M a pop. What a slap in the face who were diseased from this product, families effected, etc.

Who is the plaintiff attorney for this one, what is he/she smoking, and where can I get some?

I think this should be reconsidered sooner rather than later.

But that’s just my opinion………………. A humble one, of course…..