Comments on: Undisclosed Conflicts At University Of Wisconsin

By: LILLYK

LILLYK — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:37:07 +0000

I do not agree that Senatato Grassley is is really concerned about disclosure of pharmaceuticals and research.—-if this was true there would not be any more conflict of interest with research reports. Every time I read a report that reports—no financial disclosure—I search and find that there is a conflict of interest.. Congress or Sen. Grassley is not interested in the truth. Members of Congress all have investments with health care industries and pharmaceuticals.

By: LILLY K

LILLY K — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:23:39 +0000

To Stan:
If Sen. Grassley is so wonderful—why does the uncontrolled conflict of interest ontinue? Every time I read a report that reports no financial disclosures—I research and find that there are. Congress should require all research to report the truth. The reason this exists is because members of Congress all have investments with the healthcare industries and pharmaceuticals.
CORRUPTION IN OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!

By: Evelyn Pringle

Evelyn Pringle — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:43:21 +0000

I’d have to agree that Grassley is the King of exposures here.

I can’t think of anybody in the Senate who I admire more them him.

By: Stan

Stan — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:13:47 +0000

Sen Grassley really got the ball rolling on disclosure by pharmaceuticals and it’s good to see the press have plenty of examples on this issue.

Go Pharmalot!

By: Evelyn Pringle

Evelyn Pringle — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:02:18 +0000

I have to say the Milwaukee reporters have done a pretty good job at nailing down Wisconsin (where I live) doctors with undisclosed conflicts of interest over the past few years.

Kudos to Ed for drawing attention to their latest revelations.

By: terry

terry — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:47:26 +0000

Dirty docs taking the cash….loving all that money.