<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genzyme Adds Board Member As Troubles Mount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/genzyme-adds-board-member-as-troubles-mount/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/genzyme-adds-board-member-as-troubles-mount/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/genzyme-adds-board-member-as-troubles-mount/#comment-450674</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20366#comment-450674</guid>
		<description>Great pick-up, Ed!

One thing is certain: if Whitworth's Relational Investors wanted a new board member who'll advocate for an early "&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/12/bob-bertolini-appointed-to-genzymes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;cash-out&lt;/b&gt; exit, at essentially &lt;b&gt;any cost&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;" to all the other stakeholders, and possibly even the smaller common shareholders. . . in SGP Ex-CFO Bob Bertolini, they've likely found their man (solely in my opinion -- given that he likely will personally pocket something like &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;$120 million&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, all-in, for his part in &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;busting-up old Schering-Plough&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).

In an unusual twist, see the link above for much more -- about Bertolini's continuing "&lt;i&gt;confidentiality and non-use obligations&lt;/i&gt;" in favor of New Merck -- each arguably not allowing him to participate in many Genzyme board discussions or decisions -- and, in perpetuity, it would seem.

Namaste -- should be interesting to watch it all unfold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great pick-up, Ed!</p>
<p>One thing is certain: if Whitworth&#8217;s Relational Investors wanted a new board member who&#8217;ll advocate for an early &#8220;<i><b><a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/12/bob-bertolini-appointed-to-genzymes.html" rel="nofollow">cash-out</a></b> exit, at essentially <b>any cost</b></i>&#8221; to all the other stakeholders, and possibly even the smaller common shareholders. . . in SGP Ex-CFO Bob Bertolini, they&#8217;ve likely found their man (solely in my opinion &#8212; given that he likely will personally pocket something like <i><b>$120 million</b></i>, all-in, for his part in <i><b>busting-up old Schering-Plough</b></i>).</p>
<p>In an unusual twist, see the link above for much more &#8212; about Bertolini&#8217;s continuing &#8220;<i>confidentiality and non-use obligations</i>&#8221; in favor of New Merck &#8212; each arguably not allowing him to participate in many Genzyme board discussions or decisions &#8212; and, in perpetuity, it would seem.</p>
<p>Namaste &#8212; should be interesting to watch it all unfold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.147 seconds -->

