<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glaxo Pulls Cervical Cancer Ads In India: Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rao</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/#comment-543479</link>
		<dc:creator>rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20639#comment-543479</guid>
		<description>if GSK used any NGo or any other not profit organization to promote regarding cervical cancer then it will be good...

if their intention is not to promote their drugs and indian laws will not allow promotion prescription drugs strictly..

and GSK knows abut but they had taken a chance but it doesn't work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if GSK used any NGo or any other not profit organization to promote regarding cervical cancer then it will be good&#8230;</p>
<p>if their intention is not to promote their drugs and indian laws will not allow promotion prescription drugs strictly..</p>
<p>and GSK knows abut but they had taken a chance but it doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrons99</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/#comment-455931</link>
		<dc:creator>patrons99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20639#comment-455931</guid>
		<description>DTCA should be outlawed. It's every bit as dangerous to public health as ghostwritten clinical research, ghostwritten medical practice guidelines, and ghostwritten CME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DTCA should be outlawed. It&#8217;s every bit as dangerous to public health as ghostwritten clinical research, ghostwritten medical practice guidelines, and ghostwritten CME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice in MI</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/#comment-455439</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice in MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20639#comment-455439</guid>
		<description>Whatever post hoc rationale, it appears that GSK did, indeed, break Indian law.

Is this another "freedom of commercial speech" initiative?  Is the real motivation to test Indian law in court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever post hoc rationale, it appears that GSK did, indeed, break Indian law.</p>
<p>Is this another &#8220;freedom of commercial speech&#8221; initiative?  Is the real motivation to test Indian law in court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Calfee</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/#comment-455433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Calfee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20639#comment-455433</guid>
		<description>Why is GSK's advertising an "abuse" of DTCA?  I have no idea whether it violates Indian law, but it is hard to see why Indian women would be worse off is they knew more about cervical cancer and (one hopes) how to prevent it.  The two HPV vaccines promise to be far more useful in poor nations, such as India, than in wealthy nations, because early cervical cancer testing and treatment is so rare.  Surely, GSK's DTCA would save lives by reducing underuse of HPV vaccines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is GSK&#8217;s advertising an &#8220;abuse&#8221; of DTCA?  I have no idea whether it violates Indian law, but it is hard to see why Indian women would be worse off is they knew more about cervical cancer and (one hopes) how to prevent it.  The two HPV vaccines promise to be far more useful in poor nations, such as India, than in wealthy nations, because early cervical cancer testing and treatment is so rare.  Surely, GSK&#8217;s DTCA would save lives by reducing underuse of HPV vaccines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrons99</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/glaxo-pulls-cervical-cancer-ads-in-india-report/#comment-454518</link>
		<dc:creator>patrons99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20639#comment-454518</guid>
		<description>Wow! This post is absolutely precious. Thanks, Ed. It is quite clear that India faces some of the very same DTCA abuses that we face in our country. Perhaps our FDA would do well to take notes on how the problem was handled in India. I hope that appropriate punitive legal sanctions were issued for breaking the law. Who would ever have thought that GSK might violate the "Drugs and Magical Remedies Act"? Governments all over the world need to understand that GSK's agenda is not just to promote its cervical cancer vaccine, but to mandate it. Never mind that it's a magical remedy for which a condom (or abstinence) would certainly be a lot less expensive, and by many accounts, safer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This post is absolutely precious. Thanks, Ed. It is quite clear that India faces some of the very same DTCA abuses that we face in our country. Perhaps our FDA would do well to take notes on how the problem was handled in India. I hope that appropriate punitive legal sanctions were issued for breaking the law. Who would ever have thought that GSK might violate the &#8220;Drugs and Magical Remedies Act&#8221;? Governments all over the world need to understand that GSK&#8217;s agenda is not just to promote its cervical cancer vaccine, but to mandate it. Never mind that it&#8217;s a magical remedy for which a condom (or abstinence) would certainly be a lot less expensive, and by many accounts, safer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.152 seconds -->

