<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roches&#8217; Tamiflu May Not Be So Useful, After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patrons99</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/#comment-452464</link>
		<dc:creator>patrons99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20323#comment-452464</guid>
		<description>Maybe the wolf is at the door...the hemorhagic pneumonic plague in the Ukraine.  You wouldn’t know it from the mainstream media, CDC, WHO, EMEA, and FDA, however. Over a million infected. About 500 deaths. See also David Phillips BNET article of December 16th, titled “Efficacy of Roche’s Flu Drug Tamiflu in Doubt”.

http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005827/efficacy-of-roches-flu-drug-tamiflu-in-doubt/

Here’s another recent article that may be of interest to your readers and might bear on the efficacy (or lack of efficacy) of Roche’s Tamiflu.

From where did the 2009 'swine-origin' influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge?
Virology Journal 2009, 6:207 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-6-207
Adrian J Gibbs (adrian_j_gibbs@hotmail.com)
John S Armstrong (j_s_armstrong@hotmail.com)
Jean C Downie (jean.downie@bigpond.com.au)

Publication date 24 November 2009
Article URL http://www.virologyj.com/content/6/1/207

"The possibility that human activity may have had some role in its (the swine flu virus)
origins should not be dismissed without a dispassionate analysis of all available
evidence," the paper states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the wolf is at the door&#8230;the hemorhagic pneumonic plague in the Ukraine.  You wouldn’t know it from the mainstream media, CDC, WHO, EMEA, and FDA, however. Over a million infected. About 500 deaths. See also David Phillips BNET article of December 16th, titled “Efficacy of Roche’s Flu Drug Tamiflu in Doubt”.</p>
<p><a href="http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005827/efficacy-of-roches-flu-drug-tamiflu-in-doubt/" rel="nofollow">http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005827/efficacy-of-roches-flu-drug-tamiflu-in-doubt/</a></p>
<p>Here’s another recent article that may be of interest to your readers and might bear on the efficacy (or lack of efficacy) of Roche’s Tamiflu.</p>
<p>From where did the 2009 &#8217;swine-origin&#8217; influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge?<br />
Virology Journal 2009, 6:207 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-6-207<br />
Adrian J Gibbs (adrian_j_gibbs@hotmail.com)<br />
John S Armstrong (j_s_armstrong@hotmail.com)<br />
Jean C Downie (jean.downie@bigpond.com.au)</p>
<p>Publication date 24 November 2009<br />
Article URL <a href="http://www.virologyj.com/content/6/1/207" rel="nofollow">http://www.virologyj.com/content/6/1/207</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The possibility that human activity may have had some role in its (the swine flu virus)<br />
origins should not be dismissed without a dispassionate analysis of all available<br />
evidence,&#8221; the paper states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harpy</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/#comment-450447</link>
		<dc:creator>harpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20323#comment-450447</guid>
		<description>Will we still believe them when the wolf is really at the door?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we still believe them when the wolf is really at the door?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn Pringle</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/#comment-450437</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn Pringle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20323#comment-450437</guid>
		<description>A story I read by Bloomberg said Roche expected to make over $2 billion this year off Tamiflu.

It also mentioned that less than 9,000 people worldwide had died from the swine flu since April.  

Considering that the world population is about 6.7 billion, I'd say we got bilked big time by the vaccine makers via the swine flu profiteering scheme but not without the helping hand of our government officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story I read by Bloomberg said Roche expected to make over $2 billion this year off Tamiflu.</p>
<p>It also mentioned that less than 9,000 people worldwide had died from the swine flu since April.  </p>
<p>Considering that the world population is about 6.7 billion, I&#8217;d say we got bilked big time by the vaccine makers via the swine flu profiteering scheme but not without the helping hand of our government officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harpy</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/#comment-450375</link>
		<dc:creator>harpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20323#comment-450375</guid>
		<description>This story seems to go right to the heart of the debate over company-funded studies and registering clinical trials.  Very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story seems to go right to the heart of the debate over company-funded studies and registering clinical trials.  Very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrons99</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/12/roches-tamiflu-may-not-be-so-useful-after-all/#comment-450362</link>
		<dc:creator>patrons99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=20323#comment-450362</guid>
		<description>It's not just efficacy that's at issue with the neuraminidase inhibitors. There have been a fairly large number of associated neuropsychiatric side effects reported, including amnesia. I don't believe that safety in pregnancy has been established. Let's pray it doesn't prove to be teratogenic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just efficacy that&#8217;s at issue with the neuraminidase inhibitors. There have been a fairly large number of associated neuropsychiatric side effects reported, including amnesia. I don&#8217;t believe that safety in pregnancy has been established. Let&#8217;s pray it doesn&#8217;t prove to be teratogenic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.154 seconds -->

