FDA To Review J&J And Amgen Anemia Meds

2 Comments

heart-attackThe agency plans to hold an advisory committee meeting because studies have found that high dosages of Amgen’s Aranesp and Epogen and Johnson & Johnson’s Procrit boost the risk of heart attacks, strokes and blood clots in anemia patients with kidney disease. The purpose of the meeting, which hasn’t been scheduled yet, is to determine the appropriate dosages.

Known as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, or ESAs, the drugs boost hemoglobin levels in anemics, but the drugmakers have been plagued by cardiovascular risks that caused sales to decline. As it turns out, using large doses to cause hemoglobin to return normal levels may also increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes, instead of lowering the risk.

“Randomized trials have endeavored to show that using ESAs to raise hemoglobin concentration to higher targets improves clinical outcomes,” Bob Temple, deputy director for clinical science at the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and his colleagues wrote in a commentary in this week’s edition of The New England Journal of Medicine. “Unfortunately and unexpectedly, all results have suggested the opposite.”

UPDATE: One analyst says….

In an investor note today, Joel Sendek, an analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, writes: “In our opinion, the tone of the FDA’s editorial does not bode well for Amgen’s ESA franchise and could cast a cloud over continued broad ESA use. The authors demand clear clinical evidence of optimal hemoglobin targets, a dosing algorithm, and monitoring approach for patients with CKD-related anemia. We find the FDA’s method of communicating its concerns, via an NEJM article rather than just scheduling the advisory committee, as a clear sign that ESAs are a high-priority issue, and the FDA’s perspective is clear. We view the FDA’s editorial in the NEJM as a method of applying pressure on Amgen to conduct large-scale, expensive clinical trials directly assessing for efficacy and safety of ESAs, which were assessed as part of the original NDA submission, as well as pressuring physicians directly to decrease ESA use.”

Jump to comments

Share

Comments

  1. This stuff is only repeat information that was last published in October 2009. It is old and well digested news that anyone following Amgen would know ad nausea. Amgen has overkilled with clinicals and has recommended the proper dosage of EPO/Aranesp. Some doctors have gone well beyond the limits, and makes the whole project look like death around every corner.

    I have no idea why the shares have negatively reacted today, since this news is so old. Joel Sendek is an analyst, and I think he is trying to get more readers. So, shock the community!

    If all the physicians stuck to the Amgen use guidelines, there wouldn’t be the problem that now exists.

    Keep in mind, EPO came on the market in 1989,20 years ago. The only difference between EPO and Aranesp is, Aranesp has a longer effect.

    What Amgen has to be concerned with, is Denosumab aka, Prolia. Waiting for the final FDA approval is like waiting for the cows to come home. They hope that Prolia sales will make back most of the lost EPO/Aranesp sales. May I be candid and say, “dog paddling”?

  2. amgen had reps go into dialysis clinics and do chart reviews of epo dosing. suggestions were made to increase the dose, thus increasing the revenue of the clinic. even had financial spreadsheet showing profits made by using overfill.

Leave a Comment


+ six = 14

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Comments feed for this post only.

Clear

Clear

All rights reserved, UBM Canon. Copyright, UBM Canon.

Thanks for trying out the new Pharmalot printing tools. If you're got any suggestions for how we can help you print better, please let us know by clicking on the contact link at http://www.pharmalot.com/