Smokers Say Glaxo’s Nicorette Ads Don’t ‘Suck’
3 CommentsBy Ed Silverman // January 26th, 2010 // 7:11 am
If you think using the word ’suck’ in a TV commercial is inappropriate, you’re in the minority. A new spot for GlaxoSmithKline’s Nicorette gum, which is promoted to help people quit smoking, prominently uses the ’s’ word and, after viewing, the ad was considered appropriate or extremely appropriate by 72 percent of smokers and 65 percent of those who don’t smoke.
Responses came from 300 viewers, and nearly half of the smokers, or 49 percent, were more likely to try to quit after viewing the ad, which uses the word ’sucks’ to convey how difficult quitting can be. In fact, 80 percent found the ad to be extremely or somewhat effective and 34 percent indicated they would be more likley to use Nicorette. The survey was conducted by HCD Research (look here to watch the ad).
Nicorette doesn’t come cheap, though. The gum retails for anywhere from $43 to $62, depending upon the number of pieces in each pack. As CNBC’s Mike Huckman points out, selling Nicorettes doesn’t suck.
M. Black
Use the gum before the patch.
Arlene
This is great news for people like me who create work like this. Thanks for sharing the story.
Bill Schmidt
My 8 year old son questions why it is OK for “suck” to be used in your commercials on radio and TV. I tell him it is a word like many others, that is used by those with limited imagination and lazy intellect. We regularly drive past a Glaxo facility a few miles from home. He just looks at the building and wonders out loud why “that company” can’t come up with a commercial that doesn’t use “that word”.