<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glaxo Blocks Employee Access To CafePharma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/</link>
	<description>News, Comment and Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lynchehaun</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-649358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lynchehaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-649358</guid>
		<description>I've had an ongoing dispute with Bristol-Myers. Their tactics in trying to suppress the truth are quite different to Glaxo's. Restricting access to CP during working hours seems a fairly innocuous ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had an ongoing dispute with Bristol-Myers. Their tactics in trying to suppress the truth are quite different to Glaxo&#8217;s. Restricting access to CP during working hours seems a fairly innocuous ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-580164</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-580164</guid>
		<description>Who cares, I am surprised it isn't wide spread. Using the company computer to read and comment on Cafepharma should be banned. Do it from home, why use the company laptop for anything but company business, you are asking to be fired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares, I am surprised it isn&#8217;t wide spread. Using the company computer to read and comment on Cafepharma should be banned. Do it from home, why use the company laptop for anything but company business, you are asking to be fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSK Zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-511560</link>
		<dc:creator>GSK Zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-511560</guid>
		<description>What's all the fuss?

GSK folks can simply post from home (using a proxy).

Let's not make everything a big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s all the fuss?</p>
<p>GSK folks can simply post from home (using a proxy).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not make everything a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Pharma Marketing Director</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499946</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Pharma Marketing Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 21:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499946</guid>
		<description>Hmm this reminds me I haven't read CP for quite some time....Hey wait a minute..Gee look at the free publicity GSK generated for CP by this announcement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm this reminds me I haven&#8217;t read CP for quite some time&#8230;.Hey wait a minute..Gee look at the free publicity GSK generated for CP by this announcement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WB</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499897</link>
		<dc:creator>WB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499897</guid>
		<description>Most unsuccessful whistleblowers get their information from the hard, factual, truth also.

Often times no one will listen.

Face it. There's no profit for the lawyers in preventing death or injury.

Nor I dare say for the justice department either. The lawyers are only interested when there are penalities. That goes for DOJ too. It looks much better for their careers to have gotten a major fine or conviction than saying I prevented 10,000 people from being killed.

The latter can be argued with the former can't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most unsuccessful whistleblowers get their information from the hard, factual, truth also.</p>
<p>Often times no one will listen.</p>
<p>Face it. There&#8217;s no profit for the lawyers in preventing death or injury.</p>
<p>Nor I dare say for the justice department either. The lawyers are only interested when there are penalities. That goes for DOJ too. It looks much better for their careers to have gotten a major fine or conviction than saying I prevented 10,000 people from being killed.</p>
<p>The latter can be argued with the former can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Black</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499858</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499858</guid>
		<description>Successful whistleblowers get their information from the truth.  Hard, factual, truth.  Those that "pretend" to blow the whistle, or better worded distort or just plain invent facts in order to blow the whistle should be debarred from ever working in pharma again.

MB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successful whistleblowers get their information from the truth.  Hard, factual, truth.  Those that &#8220;pretend&#8221; to blow the whistle, or better worded distort or just plain invent facts in order to blow the whistle should be debarred from ever working in pharma again.</p>
<p>MB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whistler</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499830</link>
		<dc:creator>Whistler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499830</guid>
		<description>Sounds alot like Glaxo is trying to force reps-employees into only listening to Glaxo Ideas. Seems to me we heard this before somewhere. Didn't the Government take away the privilege to read at one time and weren't there many stories written about that same thing?
Sounds like Glaxo is trying to HIDE something and they are taking their Ball and playing elsewhere. ****You would really think that if they spent more time trying to make their company the Best Company to Work for then they really wouldn't receive the negative comments or even care about those comments!
Memo to Glaxo: Welcome to the 21st century, glad you could come by and while your here grow-up, grow some balls and fix things for the better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds alot like Glaxo is trying to force reps-employees into only listening to Glaxo Ideas. Seems to me we heard this before somewhere. Didn&#8217;t the Government take away the privilege to read at one time and weren&#8217;t there many stories written about that same thing?<br />
Sounds like Glaxo is trying to HIDE something and they are taking their Ball and playing elsewhere. ****You would really think that if they spent more time trying to make their company the Best Company to Work for then they really wouldn&#8217;t receive the negative comments or even care about those comments!<br />
Memo to Glaxo: Welcome to the 21st century, glad you could come by and while your here grow-up, grow some balls and fix things for the better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499806</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499806</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the CP ban is going to facilitate the creation of a group on Facebook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the CP ban is going to facilitate the creation of a group on Facebook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-FDA</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499796</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-FDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499796</guid>
		<description>Pharmavet,

Getting fired for porn would never happen at the FDA.

Just look at the SEC they're now trying to retaliate against the SEC IG who reported it.

Viewing Pharmalot and Pharmagossip are another matter.

See no evil.
Hear no evil.
Definitely never document any evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pharmavet,</p>
<p>Getting fired for porn would never happen at the FDA.</p>
<p>Just look at the SEC they&#8217;re now trying to retaliate against the SEC IG who reported it.</p>
<p>Viewing Pharmalot and Pharmagossip are another matter.</p>
<p>See no evil.<br />
Hear no evil.<br />
Definitely never document any evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: likeitis</title>
		<link>http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/05/glaxo-blocks-employee-access-to-cafepharma/#comment-499768</link>
		<dc:creator>likeitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 09:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pharmalot.com/?p=23043#comment-499768</guid>
		<description>Whistleblowers don't get their hard evidence from the internet, blogorama, or even cafe pharma.  Looks like securing all the wrong *exits* to me.  Think again guys.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whistleblowers don&#8217;t get their hard evidence from the internet, blogorama, or even cafe pharma.  Looks like securing all the wrong *exits* to me.  Think again guys&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.160 seconds -->

